Research Seminars

The UID research seminar is an opportunity for researchers, PhD students, and guests to engage in critical discussions related to design research. Seminars are generally based on a research publication or work in progress that the participants are encouraged to read ahead of time. If you would like to participate in a seminar, contact brendon.clark@umu.se.

The seminars, which are currently on Zoom, are open to everyone.

______________________________________________________________

Research Seminars - Fall 2021 

______________________________________________________________

September 14, 2021, 13:15-15:00

Research through and through design with Johan Redström (Umeå Institute of Design)

There are both advantages and disadvantages of articulating, or defining, a certain form of (design) research by comparing different ways in which design and research can be related to each other. A key advantage is that one can achieve a certain sense of precision without actually having to account for precisely what the components 'research' and 'design' are, as the precision of the distinction instead can be achieved on basis of the difference between the alternatives. For instance, without saying anything about what research or design is, we can still say that research through design is different from research on design in that it is not looking at design from distance, but actively engaged in design and making. And in the context of design research, this actually takes us quite far, and it allows us to explain how both conceptual and methodological frameworks can be combined.

There are, however, also disadvantages with this tactic, the most crucial one being that it probably also hides a great many things. For instance, we might ask, to what extent do the constituent forms of 'design' and 'research' become something else as we combine them?; is 'research through design' a process where the components retain their identity and properties, or does this transform them into something new? As we look at the work being done under the heading of research through design, there is a spectrum of examples ranging from processes where existing (design) practice only to a limited extent is transformed by the change in intent towards research, to examples where the very purpose is to create a new (design research) 'practice'. It is not so much a question of what form is best, they are just different from each other.

In what follows, I would like to explore what 'research through design' is and might become by asking questions about what the notion of 'through' actually refers to.

Publication will be distributed one week prior to the seminar.

______________________________________________________________

Research Seminar - September 28, 2021, 13:15-15:00

Expressive Entities - An exploration and critical reflection on the poetic engagements with technology with Young Suk Lee (University of Twente)

This research exploration and suggestion aims to add another keen inspirational value to the fields of Human Computer Interaction and Design, creating a new space to embrace the creative spirit and imaginative vision of "a poetic use of technology". The dictionary term and meaning of "poetic" is "having or expressing the qualities of poetry (as through aesthetic or emotional impact)". In my research, the term of poetic meaning is not holding back the idea of remaining as a romantic and fantasy imagination that is possibly opposite of a realistic use, nor aligned with the utilitarian ways of thinking about a use. My definition of "a poetic use" means a use of encountering poetic experience; this means I am endeavoring to create a creative engagement through technology in a poetic way that will meet humanity's authentic needs for aesthetic interaction to elicit emotional impacts in everyday life. I aim to provide vivid experiences in a more organic way, aiming to empower humans to recognize their own rich emotions and construct subjective perceptions in a dynamic relation with technology. It means I designed interactions for humans to actively receive a digital entity while allowing open-ended exploration, acceptance, and adoption of technology that is not separable from one's own identity, personality, belief and cultural aspects. Thus, this conceptual approach builds a creative digital emergence in which humans can stand at the center of the interactive experience as a protagonist. Ultimately, my artistic idea and effort aim to lead us to revisit the default belief and conventional approach to technology in our society, and the reflection helps us to thoughtfully re-connect technology to human beings.

Bio: Young Suk Lee is a multimedia artist and researcher currently working on a PhD dissertation (University of Twente, The Netherlands) based on my body of work of interactive computational art & design. She was working at Indiana University in South Bend, IN, USA as an assistant professor of Integrated New Media Studies, but recently resigned from her teaching position (May, 2021) to focus on thinking and making new interactive art & design projects.

She has a BFA and an MFA, (Fine Art, Hong-Ik University. Seoul, South Korea) and has gained the essential foundations of Art practice. She studied digital art while obtaining a second MFA with an emphasis on interactive art (Digital Art, Indiana University, Bloomington). Then, Young Suk expanded her interests in Human-Computer Interaction by earning a M.S degree (School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, IUB) under Intel Social Computing Research Grant. She also holds a minor major in art history (Modern/Contemporary Art).

______________________________________________________________

UID PhD Festival - Theme: Research Through Design
October 12, 13 & 14th

Opening Research Seminar (Keynote) October 12, 2021, 14:00-15:45

The Challenge of Improving Designing
Erik Stolterman (Indiana University & Umeå Institute of Design)

"In this talk I will discuss research aimed at improving design practice. I will argue that the design process is impossible to fully control and because of that, cannot guarantee a desired outcome. As a result, there is a need to carefully reflect on how design research aimed at improving design practice takes on this task. I will also argue that any research aimed at supporting or improving designing has to be grounded in a deep understanding of the nature and practice of designing"

Reading: Stolterman, E. (2021). The challenge of improving designing. International Journal of Design, 15(1), 65-74.

Each of the 10 PhD students affiliated with UID is asked to relate their PhD project to the festival theme Research Through Design.

October 13, 2021 13:00-17:00
October 14, 2021 13:00-17:00

Full schedule will follow.

______________________________________________________________

October 26, 2021 14:00-15:45 - Research Seminar

Five orientations to envision and evoke better futures with Hillary Carey (Carnegie Mellon) 

In a draft of a book chapter for an edited volume titled, Rehearsing Racial Equity, I propose five possible orientations for evoking ideas about the future-- that go beyond simply describing those visions. I draw from the many different ways that activists, artists, ethicists, political scientists, theologians, rhetoricians, and many others engage in bringing the future into the present. These orientations are intertwined and stackable but I believe it is still useful to define them separately: Protopian, Proleptic, Prophetic, Prefigurative, and Pre-enacted Futures.

A summary of the book chapter can be found here.

Draft book chapter may be forthcoming…

Bio: In the engaged community of Oakland, California, Hillary recently she joined DesignDept.co as a design leadership coach. Before that she directed in-depth user research at her firm, Winnow Research, for seven years. Before that she worked in Silicon Valley in-house at large tech companies and a start-up and also as an innovation consultant with IDEO.

Hillary is particularly interested in creative ways to incorporate iterative and tangible learning tools, such as cultural probes and collaborative prototyping in a range of design processes. Through Winnow's work with Kaiser Permanente, she has practiced participatory innovation techniques-- designing the space, technology, roles, and flows of medical buildings alongside workers and cross-disciplinary teams.

Teaching as an adjunct at the college level has been an essential part of exploring the applications of design and design research. Teaching in both the Industrial Design and Interaction Design programs at California College of the Arts, and teaching Design Thinking and Innovation to graduate-level journalism students at the Northwestern campus in San Francisco.

Her dissertation inquiry combines the complex social challenge of racism and racism-denial in the United States with the creative work of materializing visions of better futures. Is there a connection between experiencing a long-term vision of a better, more just, more healed society for everyone and the mindset changes needed today?

______________________________________________________________

November 16, 2021 - 13:15-15:00 - Research Seminar

Thomas Binder (Design School Kolding) 

Design School Kolding's Lab for Sustainability and Design, the move to Design for Planet, and the conception of the design laboratory as put forward in The Things We Do: Encountering the Possible chapter.

______________________________________________________________

November 23, 2021 13:15-15:00 - Research Seminar

Unmaking Utopian Fabulations: Collaborative Experiences of Designing with Bodily Fluids with Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard (The Oslo School of Architecture), Karey Helms & Nadia Campo (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)

This seminar takes the Nordes 2021 exploratory paper " Scaling Bodily Fluids for Utopian Fabulations" as a starting point to present and discuss an ecology of collaborations, projects and design work on human bodily fluids. The paper presents four utopian fabulations (see images below) in which urine, menstrual blood, and human milk are designed with beyond the scale of a singular human body. Each fabulation illustrates queer scales and uses of bodily fluids through extended or improper uses as pathways towards caring multi-species relations within a damaged environment. Through the seminar, we collaboratively unmake the stories and unpack where they come from, both in our individual research projects and shared interests and experiences. While each fabulations is a world with worlds they are also paths forward into our current research projects, where continued material engagements with bodily fluids are furthering our excitements for designing with bodily fluids. 

Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard (she/her) is a designer, feminist, and postdoctoral researcher at The Oslo School of Architecture and Design (AHO). Her work is exploring speculative and feminist design of future technologies. https://mljuul.com/ 

Nadia Campo Woytuk (she/her) is a PhD student in Interaction Design at KTH Royal Institute of Technology. She explores feminist approaches to the design of technologies, drawing from  ecofeminism, more-than-human design and postcolonial computing. https://nadiacw.com/

Karey Helms (she/her) is a PhD student in Interaction Design at KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Her research draws upon Care ethics and queer theories for a more careful design of technology. https://www.kareyhelms.com/

______________________________________________________________

UID Research Seminars - Spring 2021

May 25th, 2021: Keywords in Participatory Design: past, present, alternative paths with Andrea Botero

13:15-15:00 via Zoom. For the link, write to  brendon.clark@umu.se

Participatory Design (PD) --with capital letters -grew out of linkages between technology designers and worker movements in the 1970s in scandinavia. But ofcourse other participatory and collective design practices have also been evolving globally. Now, as participation has emerged as an increasingly popular but also contested idea in design fields, new conversations about what we mean by "participation" and in what kind of "desings" need to scale out. The issue of how we imagine the kinds of knowledge central to collective practices, is critical and the community is shapeshifting. The seminar invites participants to an exploration around some of the emerging keywords in this research and practice community as they appear in the past and current call for papers for PDC and a recently published alternative zine.

Andrea Botero is an Academy of Finland research fellow at the School of Arts, Design and Architecture of Aalto University and conspirator at the design studio Suo&Co. Her design work explores technologies, services, media formats and genres for collectives and communities. Through her research she aims to understand how collectives come to understand the design spaces available to them and how designers could support infrastructuring and commoning processes around them.

______________________________________________________________

April 27, 2021: "Envisioning Alternative Design Museums", with Anja Neidhardt, Heather Wiltse and Anna Croon Fors

13:15-15:00 via Zoom. For the link, write to brendon.clark@umu.se

The design discipline takes part in the distribution of privilege and oppression (Buckley, 2020; Canli & Prado de O. Martins, 2016; Costanza-Chock, 2020). And it is highly supported by design museums. This is why changing design museums might contribute to dis-entangling the discipline from these discriminatory structures.

In this seminar, we will first discuss different ways of how established design museums could be dis-entangled from systems of privilege and discrimination. The discussion will be based on a paper that was recently submitted for publication. It will be followed by a workshop in which we invite you to collaboratively envision a variety of possibilities of how alternative design museums might operate and look like.

ABSTRACT:  The design discipline is entangled with systems of privilege and discrimination (Buckley, 2020; Canli & Prado de O. Martins, 2016; Costanza-Chock, 2020; Criado-Perez, 2019; Pater, 2016); and design museums play a key role in supporting them. Changing design museums might thus be one way of dis-entangling the discipline from these oppressive structures. In this paper, we explore possibilities for how this might be done. We first employ scalar-framing (Hunt, 2020), zooming in, around and out to explore an expanded scale of approaches that might be applied in order to change existing design museums. We identify and analyse design museums' key elements and processes in relation to upholding potentially problematic aspects of the design discipline before turning to looking for alternatives to replace them. Drawing inspiration from protest archives, we imagine what alternative design museums could be like. Specifically, we introduce the concept of alternative design museums as a scaffold for emerging forms of gathering around more just processes and outcomes of design. 

Photo credit: Jen Hoyer / Interference Archive 

______________________________________________________________

March 9, 2021: "When the prototype becomes the product in design education - prototyping design education in transition", with Brendon Clark (UID)

13:15-15:00 via Zoom. For the link, write to brendon.clark@umu.se

In this seminar I would like to introduce and discuss a specific view about the current state of industrial design education in this specific time of the current crisis, and a way of analyzing current teaching experiences. The work presented during this seminar comes from as part of a current project focusing on best practices in remote teaching at UID during 2020, and proposal-in-progress for a project application for a Hybrid Design Lab potentially starting in the Fall focusing on transitioning from online to hybrid learning arrangements, and a work-in-progress article for a journal article for a special issue on Alternative Studios: Design Education Changes in 2020.

 ______________________________________________________________

February 23, 2021: "Mapping Design Methods: a reflection on project cultures", with Maria Göransdotter (UID) and Valentina Auricchio (Polimi)

13:15-15:00 via Zoom. For the link, write to   brendon.clark@umu.se

This article springs from a recently initated research collaboration between Valentina Auricchio, Politecnico di Milano (Polimi), and Maria Göransdotter, Umeå Institute of Design (UID). It outlines a direction for a joint research endeavour bringing together design research and design historical research from a perspective of design methods. The article has been submitted to the Italian journal A/I/S Design, Storia e Ricerche, for an edition themed "Relational geographies in the history of design" (still in review). We are proposing a programmatic framework that brings design methods to the attention of design history, and attention to the historicity of design in design practices. We will do this through sketching a map, a geography in time, to move toward a deeper understanding of the evolution of methods linked to the specific cultures and contexts from which they emerge, the cross-overs, and historical interrelations between these. This article is a starting point for a wider research project, an example bringing design historical and design methodological research agendas closer to each other. Starting from specific interviews with Italian designers that bring evidence to a gap of analysis in this field, we highlight the need for a deeper and continued investigation into design histories of design methods.

 ______________________________________________________________

February 8, 20201: Design Dialogues and the third turn, with Brendon Clark & Nicholas Torretta

In this seminar focusing on a work-in-progress paper position paper for a CHI workshop (Decolonizing Design Practice), we look to how dialogue in design comes about and how it unfolds in order to explore colonization tendencies in design with good intentions. Whether we are taking a macro look at back-on-forth moves in design, up-close inspection of the sequential unfolding of a single design encounter, we take the position that design dialogue initiation and turn-taking sequences can expose oppressive structures that close collaborative possibility, and exploratory structures that open collaborative possibility, with speculation about the multiplicity of interpretation arising through the lens of pluriversality.

______________________________________________________________

 January 26, 2021: Research Project Application Seminar with Maria Göransdotter and  Marije de Haas 

This seminar discussion will revolve around practicalities and strategies in applying for research funding. Two application proposals (in progress) for international postdoc funding from Swedish national funding bodies will form the basis for the discussion: Marije de Haas' application to Forte, and Maria Göransdotter's application to Vetenskapsrådet (VR). Please write brendon.clark@umu.se if you would like to join the seminar and receive the applications.

For the seminar, please read the applications from the perspective of the respective assessment criteria and general aims as formulated by Forte and VR. Bring both comments to Marije and Maria on how they might sharpen their project proposals and applications, and any questions you have in general about research funding application processes that we can discuss on a more general level.

To conclude, what type of funding might you be looking to apply for next?
______________________________________________________________ 

January 12, 2021:  Research Seminar - Hanne Hede Jørgensen 

Designing for Pedagogical Play in Schools - Research Seminar with Hanne Hede Jørgensen  (visiting PhD student at UID)

13:15-15:00 via Zoom. For the link, write to  brendon.clark@umu.se

During the seminar, Hanne will introduce her PhD project. Attached find a recommended text to contextualize Hanne's doctoral studies, and a Danish publication of her's.

Designing for pedagogical play practices in school
The pivot of my PhD project is the play practices of pedagogues. The project elucidates if and how pedagogues, who participate in a design for play, discover and develop play practices that can support a diversity of play participations amongst children. The purpose is to support children's ability to play in schools in general, however, the children who risk exclusion from the play communities have a special focus. The Programme of the PhD is thus what I call pedagogical play practices and the Research Question is: How can the making of play designs explore and develop pedagogical play practices that support school children's participation in play?

Collaboration with pedagogues is essentials in the study. Together with pedagogues in two schools I design for different play types and I use these play designs as explorative experiments in order to explore what pedagogical play practices can be. In addition, I have made two kinds of move testing experiments in search for ways to support pedagogues in developing a reflective and play sensitive repertoire for actions. One I call Dramatic Reflexion. The purpose of this is to engage and provoke the bodily knowledge of pedagogues. The other I - for now - call a Child-centred-doll-experiment. The purpose of this is to put my self in a pedagogical play situation, I do that in order to explore the pedagogical play practices in a phenomenological way and to create cases for the pedagogues to reflect upon.

My ambition is to generate a theory of designing for development of pedagogical play practices in schools; a theory that includes a definition of what pedagogical play practices might be and some design principles that other pedagogues can use when they want to develop their play practices in a pedagogical way.

Bio
My name is Hanne Hede Jørgensen. My educational background is cand. mag in Literature and dramaturgy. I am associated professor at Pædagoguddannelsen, VIA, Aarhus. I have taught coming pedagogues since 1999. My topics were children's culture, play, pedagogic and organizational cultures. Prior to the research I am doing now, I have done research on children's perspectives on their everyday life in Kindergarten and on how pedagogues understand what good practices are.

I am now doing a PhD on Codesign for Play and Pedagogical practice. I am doing it at Designschool Kolding. I have a lot of experience on working with pedagogues and children and I am biased according to the professions of pedagogues. Meaning, I have written critical articles on neo-liberal tendencies within the profession of pedagogues, argumenting for more reflective and classical practices. The area of design is new to me. I have until now no experience on conducting and participating in design processes. It seems, however, that my educational background on literature and dramaturgy suddenly has become interesting and applicable in new ways.

_________________________________________________________

2020, December 15:  Final PhD Seminar - Aditya Pawar

Open collaborative design: Participatory design between situated collaborations and the discourses of openness - Aditya Pawar with Discussant Åsa Ståhl (Linnaeus University)

If you would like to participate, write to brendon.clark@umu.se for Zoom link.

Abstract

Designers have recognised the expanded scope of when and where design happens; and the active role of local communities in designing the systems that they use or places that they inhabit. The scope of participatory designer's role has also expanded to infrastructuring and staging design processes as participants in a community's activities and in their socio-cultural environments. Often in situations that are rarely ever stable. In this changing context, this research investigates the increasingly ambiguous concept of openness in participatory design for social innovation. As such, openness deals with products, processes, practices and frameworks that are open to participation from a wide variety of people. As used in this research, Openness is conceptually and operationally bound to democratic values as a part of participatory design through a lineage of open source production and innovation practices; therefore, crucial for designers to unpack. At stake is the uncritical adoption of this concept by designers in initiatives that pursue socially progressive ends, often assuming it to be apolitical.

This research intends to develop capacity around the concept of openness as inclusion by prototyping of a practice. This prototypical practice aims to investigate the practice-based design ontologies brought to bear on sites and situations deemed to be open (open-to-participation) as a means of making the politics of participation visible; and to support and strengthen processes of inclusion where they appear inadequate. This research does not answer what openness is in general or impose a new taxonomy to understand it. Instead, it examines the work that particular notions of openness do to participatory design practice and how designers can respond to it.

The research practice consists of a series of three thematic enquiries, each of which includes a subset of smaller design engagements. The first set of thematic studies takes place amongst urban and rural food-producing communities, and the consecutive two studies take place within an open-innovation environment and in a higher education context, respectively. Each of these studies explores how designers can organise collaboration in a manner conscious of the constitutive effects of contemporary practices that call for openness.

Open collaborative design, the title of this dissertation, is a proposition for caring for a condition of openness as inclusion, implying the commitment of the designer to democratic values beyond the limits of design projects and site boundaries. The dissertation contributes a set of sensibilities and theoretical-practical anchors for participatory designers to reflect and respond to multiple interpretations of the openness concept, and to strengthen aspects of inclusion in sites and situations assumed to be open. This dissertation, in addition to contributing to the field of participatory design, also exposes the paradox behind some of the common interpretations of openness and in doing so contributes to fields that are concerned with supporting democratic values such as for social innovation.

_____________________________________________________________ 

_____________________________________________________________ 

May 26, 2020 - The Role of the Lecturer in Talent Development in Design Art School Education -  a Research Seminar with Suzanne Brink, Visiting PhD Student

13:15-15:00 via Zoom https://umu.zoom.us/j/760515302

"… I call it interval education. My metaphor is training for a marathon. It is about serially doing different things, and not always running the same amount at the same speed. So you play with readingassignments, class discussion, reflection, Socratic aspects, giving feedback individually, talking in group sessions... That way, the brain cannot be lazy."

In this seminar I will present my research on design program curricula in higher education that foster talent development. My qualitative study took part in 5 art schools, including UID, interviewing sixteen lecturers. To kick off the seminar, I will start by showing how I have used coding to organize my qualitative data set. Then I will present the four 'blocks' which appeared in the data (educational system, curriculum, didactics, motivation), and the three 'actors' (lecturer, student, professional field). We willzoom into the role of the lecturer in this seminar, specifically on the expectations, the humble teacher, flexibility, reciprocal learning, and assessment for learning. This will be followed by an interactive part of the seminar in which I pose some questions for the group to answer and ask for reflections on both my results and the literature suggestion, such as what do you recognize, what would you like to do more, what don't you agree with, and what enablers and barriers do you perceive?

For background reading, follow the link:

Six into One: The Contradictory Art School Curriculum and how it Came About

Houghton, Nicholas, International Journal of Art & Design Education, February 2016, Vol.35(1), pp.107-120

_____________________________________________________________ 

May 12, 2020 - Everyday Reality and Design Research Challenges / Research Seminar with Erik Stolterman

14:00-15:45 on Zoom  https://umu.zoom.us/j/760515302

Our everyday reality seems to become more complex by the day, in many cases caused by an increasing number of computational and connected devices. The complexity of our world is growing. In this talk I will discuss what this means for design and what new challenges it brings for design research (in particular interaction design research).

For background reading to support the discussion see:

• Stolterman, E. (2008).  The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 55-65.
• Janlert, Lars-Erik, and Erik Stolterman. " Complex Interaction." ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 17, no. 2 (May 2010): 1-32.

Bio

Erik Stolterman is Professor in Informatics and the Senior Executive Associate Dean of the School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering at Indiana University, Bloomington. He is also professor at the Institute of Design at Umeå University, Sweden. Stolterman is co-Editor for the Design Thinking/Design Theory book series by MIT Press, and on several editorial boards for international journals (The HCI journal, International Journal of Design, Design Studies, Design, Economics and Innovation, International Journal of Designs for Learning, Studies in Material Thinking, Human Computation, Artifact). Stolterman's main work is within the areas of HCI, interaction  design, design practice, philosophy and theory of design. Stolterman has published a large number of articles and five books, including "Thoughtful Interaction Design" (MIT Press) and "The Design Way" (MIT Press) and the recently published "Things That Keep Us Busy--The Elements of Interaction" (MIT Press, 2017).

_____________________________________________________________ 

April 28, 2020 -  Audio-Augmented Paper Drawings Tangible Interface in Educational Intervention for High-Functioning Autistic Children:  A Research Seminar with Andrea Alessandrini

_________________________________________________________ 

March 14, 2020 - Transnational Corporations from the Standpoint of Workers, a Research Seminar with Aina Tollefsen 

Tuesday, April 14th 13:15-15:00 (we have changed back to this time, plus a 10 minute break during) on Zoom https://umu.zoom.us/j/760515302

For this seminar we welcome Aina Tollefsen, a professor in the Human Geography department, to share her work on design-related topic of the organization of transnational work. 

The two main suggested readings are two chapters from her co-authored book Transnational Corporations from the Standpoint of Workers:  Chapter 11 "Production Regimes  - the Wage Labourer's Discontent" (pp. 248-272) and the Epilogue (pp. 273-278). A further (extra) reading suggestion is Alf Hornborg's article "Colonialism in the Anthropocene - the Political Ecology of the Money-Energy-Technology Complex. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, Vol. 10 No. 1, March 2019, pp. 7-21 

Find the literature on the Staff Teams under the channel: Research Seminar or click  here. 

Aina Tollefsen is Associate Professor in Human Geography at the Department of Geography, Umeå University. Her publications include "The production of the rural landscape and its labour: The development of supply chain capitalism in the Swedish berry industry", 2018. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 40(40), 69-82. (With Eriksson, M.);  and Transnational Corporations from the Standpoint of Workers, 2014. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. (With Räthzel, N. and Mulinari, D.) 

_____________________________________________________________ 

March 31, 2020 - Where do sustainability, science and design meet? A research seminar led by Viola Hakkarainen

In this seminar Viola will introduce her PhD project to open a discussion about synergies between sustainability science and participatory design research.

Sustainability science increasingly adopts collaborative research approaches to deal with uncertainty in social-ecological systems and facilitate transformations toward sustainability. Inclusion of different voices, knowledges and values into ecosystem governance is therefore seen to increase legitimacy of decisions and contribute with solutions to face sustainability challenges. However, these knowledge processes, such as weaving different knowledge systems, are often superficially described, and thus there is a lack of reflexivity of issues such as representation and power. Ultimately, the collaborative turn in knowledge production calls for new methods and approaches to bridge between science and society to produce just and actionable knowledge - a call that participatory design research could help to answer?

Background reading: 

Hakkarainen, V., Anderson, C. B., Eriksson, M., van Riper, C. J., Horcea-Milcu, A., & Raymond, C. M. (2020). Grounding IPBES experts' views on the multiple values of nature in epistemology, knowledge and collaborative science. Environmental Science and Policy, 105. 11 18.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.003

Hakkarainen, V., Soini, K., Dessein, J., Raymond, C. (2020) Place-embedded agency: A new concept for deconstructing local knowledge through place belonging. In review, please don't distribute.

Bio: Viola Hakkarainen is an interdisciplinary researcher at the Natural Resources Institute Finland and a PhD candidate at the University of Helsinki. Her research interests include knowledge weaving processes in ecosystem governance and sense of place in social-ecological systems research. She has a soft spot for philosophy of science and creative research methods.

_____________________________________________________________ 

March 17, 2020 - Defining Design Activism: A research seminar led by Anja Neidhardt

Research Studio, 13:15-15:00 (via Zoom https://umu.zoom.us/j/760515302)

Design as activism. Activism as design. Disobidient design. Activism in academia. Living a feminist life. Activist design researcher. - How do you define design? And activism? How would you describe the relationship between the two? In this seminar we will read four papers with special focus on how the authors define design (and/or) activism and how they position themselves in and with their work. After presenting her readings of the selected papers, Anja will open up the discussion. This seminar offers the possibility to not only talk about how each of us defines design (and/or) activism in their own research, but also to discuss our positionalities as researchers, designers and activists. 

Image: A poster designed by Sheila Levrant de Bretteville, called "Women in Design: The Next Decade", from 1975.

It would be great if you could at least read one of the papers; which one(s) you select to read is up to you. 

Ece Canli: "Introduction" of her PhD dissertation: Queerying Design. Material Re-Configurations of Body Politics. University of Porto, 2017. 

Tom Bieling: "Designing Activism. An Introduction", in: Design (&) Activism. Perspectives on Design as Activism and Activism as Design. Mimesis International, 2019. 

Anna Feigenbaum: "Tear Gas Design and Dissent", in: Design (&) Activism. Perspectives on Design as Activism and Activism as Design. Mimesis International, 2019.

Cheryl Buckley: "Made in Patriarchy II: Researching (or Re-Searching) Women and Design", in: Massachusetts Institute of Technology DesignIssues: Volume 36, Number 1, Winter 2020

________________________________________________________

March 3, 2020 - Technology and More-Than-Human Design: A research seminar with Elisa Giaccardi and Johan Redström

Research Studio, 13:15-15:00

As digital technologies such as big data, the internet of things, machine learning, and artificial intelligence increasingly challenge and even disrupt the everyday job of design-not to mention everyday life-there comes a need to raise critical questions about the ways we design.

February 4, 2020 - A research seminar with Monica Lindh-Karlsson. PhD student at UID. The seminar will focus on a chapter from Monica's PhD dissertation with the working title  Design Togetherness.    

_____________________________________________________________ 

November 26, 2019 - A research seminar with Monica Lindh-Karlsson. PhD student at UID. The seminar will focus on a chapter from Monica's PhD dissertation with the working title  Design Togetherness. 

Research Studio, 13.15-15.00

Here, my aim is to positioning my research within design theory about working together from three perspectives: process and methods, collaborative design and emancipatory design. The aim is to argue that we have a solid ground for knowing about working together, but our understanding in many ways draws on 'what' we are. Hence, the next chapter, which is also a theory chapter (2), aim to present concepts for working together as 'who' we are,

_____________________________________________________________ 

December 10, 2019 -  Design, power and colonisation: decolonial and anti-oppressive explorations on three approaches for Design for Sustainability  - a research seminar with Nicholas Torretta.

Research Studio,  13.15-15.00

Our contemporary world is organized in a modern/colonial structure. As people, professions and practices engage in cross-country Design for Sustainability (DfS), projects have the potential of sustaining or changing modern/colonial power structures. In such project relations, good intentions in working for sustainability do not directly result in liberation from modern/colonial power structures. In this paper we introduce three approaches in DfS that deal with power relations. Using a Freirean (1970) decolonial perspective, we analyse these approaches to see how they can inform DfS towards being decolonial and anti-oppressive. We conclude that steering DfS to become decolonial or colonizing is a relational issue based on the interplay between the designers' position in the modern/colonial structure, the design approach chosen, the place and the people involved in DfS. Hence, a continuous critical reflexive practice is needed in order to prevent DfS from becoming yet another colonial tool. 

Nicholas B. Torretta is a PhD student at UID focusing on anti-oppressive and decolonial approaches in Design for Sustainability.

_____________________________________________________________ 

PREVIOUS SEMINARS 

_____________________________________________________________ 

November 13 - Design Seminar: Looking Out from the Stall: Hygiene Resources, Maintenance, and the Internet of Things

With Sarah Fox, PhD

14:00-15:30 Research Studio 

Abstract: Restrooms may appear far from contemporary sites of innovation. But over the past decade, corporations and public institutions have begun developing internet of things (IoT) technologies for these spaces in ways that increasingly define people's experiences of hygiene resources. Drawing on a 3-year multi-sited ethnographic study, Sarah Fox will discuss how digital technologies entwine with existing forms of collaborative labor to sharpen managerial control of public restroom access and maintenance. Informed by this work, she will describe her collaboration with local activists and custodial staff to reimagine these technologies. Across 18 months throughout the city of Seattle, she developed and deployed a networked sensor designed to support the needs of people without regular access to everyday hygiene resources. This work highlights and contends with a tendency for IoT devices to prioritize concerns for cost-reducing efficiencies and regulatory techniques, rather than support collective responsibility-a concern of increasing importance as design and human-computer scholarship attends to data ethics in public life.

Bio: Sarah Fox is a Postdoctoral Fellow at Carnegie Mellon University in the Human-Computer Interaction Institute. Her research focuses on how technological artifacts challenge or propagate social exclusions, by examining existing systems and building alternatives. Her work has earned awards in leading computing venues including ACM CSCW, CHI, and DIS, and has been featured in the Journal of Peer Production and New Media and Society. She holds a Ph.D. in Human Centered Design & Engineering from the University of Washington and has worked in design research at Microsoft Research, Google, and Intel Labs.

_____________________________________________________________ 

November 12, 2019 - Feminist Approaches to Design (Education) - A research seminar with   Anja Neidhardt, PhD student UID and the Umeå Center for Gender Studies (UCGS).

Research Studio, 13.15-15.00 

The seminar will start with Anja briefly introducing the work of the platform depatriarchise design that she co-creates with Maya Ober. This presentation will be followed by a discussion of a paper that she wrote in collaboration with Maya Ober and Prof. Griselda Flesler. The paper (working title "Pedagogy of Discomfort") is a conversation on the topic of feminist design education with specific focus on the Design and Gender Studies Department at the Faculty of Architecture and Design FADU University of Buenos Aires, which is headed by Griselda.

_____________________________________________________________ 

November 5, 2019 - "Making Methods". Research Seminar with Maria Göransdotter, PhD student at UID.

Research Studio, 13.15-15.00 

The seminar will focus on the development of user-centered design methods at the 1940s Home Research Institute, in the form of a chapter draft from Maria's nearly-completed PhD dissertation with the working title Potential pasts, possible futures: making transitional design histories.

_____________________________________________________________ 

October 15, 2019 - On/Un-Certainty: A Research Seminar with Johan Redström

In this seminar Johan will introduce thoughts on design education he will be developing for an upcoming publication. 

13:15-15:00, Red Room

_____________________________________________________________ 

October 2, 2019 -   A research seminar with Catharina (Titti) Henje, a PhD student at UID. Obstacles & risks in the traffic environment for users of powered wheelchairs (PWCs) in Sweden: Disabled Vulnerable Road Users (VRU).  

In this research seminar, Catharina will present and discuss a collaborative design project and a nearly-completed paper focusing on risks and obstacles in traffic environment for users of a powered wheelchair (PWC). Currently, knowledge and attention is low for users of PWC in contexts of traffic safety as they lack their own sub-category in traffic injury statistics, making them invisible, and as very few studies are done with users on real-life experiences. PWC users are, part of an aging population, and an ever-growing group of citizens, which further emphasizes the need to be regarded in city and traffic planning. The team of researchers  from social science, traffic safety, physiotherapy, and interaction design, selected material, in the form of contextual videos and interviews, derived from an earlier qualitative study, and analysed and categorized them according to human, vehicle (PWC), and environmental factors. The findings reflect the researchers observations and the target group's own experiences of existing traffic risks in built environment. For a copy of the draft paper, send a mail to brendon.clark@umu.se.

13.15-15.00 in the Administration Conference Room.

____________________________________________________________ 

March 26 - Research Seminar with Maria Göransdotter

Practices of participation

13.15-15.00, Research Studio, Umeå Institute of Design

The seminar will introduce a thesis chapter draft on the theme of the concept of 'participation' as approached in user-centered design practices, addressing how a Swedish design history of this concept might be told.

_____________________________________________________________ 

February 6 - Research Seminar with Maja Frögård

Designing public participation - Tensions and Responsibilities between design and democracy

 13:15-15:00, Research Studio, Umeå Institute of Design

I will present a chapter from my thesis (in process) in which I discuss different notions of democracy through design examples and political philosophy to support designers to challenge understandings of democracy in their practices.

How does a state driven public process differ for a designer to engage with in relation to working for companies or private interests? Being engaged in planning processes in two different municipalities and state employed through Konstfack, I would consider the responsibilities of the designer, of myself, to be towards democratic aims. However, there are many interpretations of democracy in design; the use of democracy is connected to different purposes and agendas. Some find participation crucial, others see activism as fundamental, while others rely on the relations to institutions. In political philosophy and theory democracy is seen as unresolvable, consisting of questions and tensions that has been given different answers throughout history and depending on context. These tensions from practice and philosophy are foundational for understanding democracy as ongoing negotiations rather than something that can be resolved. Since design is practiced within different parts of society, this implies that a responsible design practice requires not only an understanding of democracy but also the frames and part of society we practice within. Rather than providing an answer of how to interpret democracy this opens up for further questions concerning designer autonomy and our relation to institutions; whose interests we are serving, how our understandings of democracy differ and who we choose to align with. 

Maja Frögård is a PhD candidate at the Art, Technology and Design program, a collaboration between Konstfack and KTH, and currently guest PhD at UID. Her projects in different ways concerns the politics of what ideas, values and realities designers partake in materializing through giving shape to things, situations and environments.  

_____________________________________________________________ 

November 13 - Research Seminar with Heather Wiltse

Conceptualizing digital mediation: Structures, dynamics, and consequences

13:15-15:00, Research Studio, Umeå Institute of Design

Nicholas B. Torretta is a Brazilian designer with focus on the social interaction aspects of design for sustainability. He has been working with design for sustainability in Sweden, Finland, Mexico, Mozambique and Brazil. Currently Nicholas is a PhD candidate at Umeå Institute of Design, where his research concerns anti-oppressive and non-colonial approaches to design as a way to nurture diversity through design

_____________________________________________________________

October 16th - A Real Imaginary Experiment - Enrique Encinas 

13:15-15:00, October 16, 2018 - Red Room, UID 

The life of a design research PhD happens among a cohort of real and fictional objects. There are materials and possibilities, words and ideas, objects and events. Telling the fictional and the real apart is a challenging task that might not make sense at all when designing. In this seminar I propose to take a look at a very real thing for a PhD: a paper published. It is a real paper about real people that write real words about real problems without revealing their real identities. It addresses a real issue about an imaginary paradigm for HCI researchers. It supports its real argument not through the use of real data but through real abstracts from imaginary papers. In bringing this paper to your attention I'd like to share not only what it is but how it came to be and the objects I considered real or fictional in the process. My presentation will be brief so we can have fun chasing the real and fictional objects that makes a PhD what it is.

I am a designer who studied electrical engineering in ETSIT (Madrid), semiconductor tech in NTU (Taiwan) and participatory design in SDU (Denmark). I have briefly supported artists in Medialab Prado (Madrid) and technical systems in Vodafone Spain. Now I am working on a PhD in Northumbria University by researching the region of the design spectrum where fiction is most visible.  enrique.encinas@northumbria.ac.uk

Recommended pre-reading: "Making Problems in Design Research: The Case of Teen Shoplifters on Tumblr." Encinas, Enrique, Mark Blythe, Shaun Lawson, John Vines, Jayne Wallace, and Pamela Briggs. Montreal, Canada, 2018. http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/33898/. 

_____________________________________________________________

 

Seminars Spring 2018

22 May 2018, 13.15-15.00
Research studio
Trang Vu
Writing workshop - "Finding your little place: Conceptual tools for constructing arguments"

This workshop focuses on how an argument can be constructed building on existing theories/concepts while opening up new perspectives. As an author, you are often expected to assertively put your points across, clearly convince readers of their significance, and demonstrate that the points are argued from rigorous critical reading. This can be a challenging task. Some of our observations from the last Academic Writing workshop in Autumn 2017 show that UID writers found themselves ¨the invisible me", "the inauthentic me", "the frustrated me", "the lagom scholar me" when working with theories and trying to communicate their own stance. This workshop provides you with an opportunity to look at your text and evaluate your own little space of argumentation. You will also start to reflect on and analyse your author's voice.

To prepare for the workshop, please bring a sample of 3 or 4 pages from your thesis or an assignment that you are working on. The writing should come from a part where you discuss your research in connection with theories/key concepts.

Please also send the sample to Trang Vu (trang.vu@umu.se) by end of Thursday 17/5/18.

---

8 May 2018, 13.15-15.00
White room
Aditya Pawar
OPEN-COLLABORATIVE-DESIGN
Participatory design between situated collaborations and the rhetoric of openness

This practice-based research sets out to investigate and intervene in practices of community based participatory design as effected by the rhetoric of openness. The thesis proposes the re-articulation of openness as it relates to the relational core of collaborative design. At stake here is the uncritical adoption of an increasingly ambiguous notion of openness inparticipatory design, which can create new forms of closure. Through a programmatic enquiry between the practices and rhetoric of openness, I propose three dimensions of open-collaboration that draw out a field of operation for designers. The practice based research elements include situated participatory design engagements with communities within and outside institutional boundaries. The first set of studies (Study 1) takes place with food producing communities and consecutive studies (study 2 and 3) take place within an open maker-space environment and in a design classroom respectively. Each study highlights a particular form of open-collaboration. Relating these particular instantiations of opencollaborations (as expressed by the studies) in relation to the research programme provides us with ways to reposition our participatory practices.

The thesis contributes a theoretical-practice toolbox to reposition a participatory design practice as forms of open-collaboration. And in general, create the conditions for a responsible society characterized by collective agency and the capacity to respond to local needs.

---

 13 April 2018, 10.00-12.00
Research studio
Holly Robbins
"Reflecting on Navigating Between STS and Design Practice"

In this seminar, I will reflect on some of the tensions that emerged in the course of conducting my PhD research navigating between science and technology studies (STS) and design practice. As a design researcher, I was concerned with theorizing "the black box" and how design could potentially support approaches to make it more legible. From STS I was working with Albert Borgmann's work on the device paradigm and focal things and practices. I made inquires into his work with a methodological cocktail of research through design and design anthropology.

This discussion will not be so much about the content of the research itself, but more of a reflection on my own experiences, and teasing out some of the tensions that emerged in navigating between STS and design practice. These tensions reflected different styles of working, values and assumptions. In particular, I found that between design practice and STS there were tensions between working with different levels of specificity and abstraction, reference points, and modes of evaluation. In this seminar I will first elaborate and contextualize some of these tensions that I experienced, but I hope to use this seminar as an opportunity to share and discuss our own experiences and reflections in trans-disciplinary design research.

---

10 April 2018, 13.15-15.00
Red room

Research Seminar Double Bill
Tuesday 10 April 2018, 13.15-15.00
Red room

D. E. Wittkower
"On Disaffordances and Dysaffordances"

Despite the still-tempting myth of technological neutrality, examples of technologies with political effects surround us, and their politics are better and better recognized-from the racist Band-Aid or "flesh colored" crayon, to the sexism of "girls" and "boys" toys, to the enforcement of ethic and gender categories in data entry fields. Research on the politics of technology is also longstanding and ongoing, from Langdon Winner's 1980 "Do artifacts have politics" to Safiya Umoja Noble's just-published Algorithms of Oppression.

This presentation seeks to support research on the politics of technology by framing a theory of disaffordances and dysaffordances. I argue that a systematic theory is necessary to clarify when technologies pass from being merely inconvenient or badly designed to being discriminatory, and present a couple of ways of getting at that distinction through extensions to affordance theory. While this work is directed toward supporting research with new theory, the talk will not be technical, and will address a series of lively examples, including racist webcams, sexist baby strollers, religious discrimination in calendars, and sexist thermostat settings.

Bruno Gransche
"Unnecessary and not impossible - Critique and design as the drivers, challenges, and consequences of accidence"

The impossible, the possible, and the necessary are three modal domains. If one wants to learn about worldviews, ambition, skills, or self-efficacy of others, it pays off to analyze how they classify entities with regard to these domains. The extension of each domain varies historically, ideologically, and individually but the extension of the possible is the only one in which decisions and actions matter. The impossible and the necessary cannot be altered by actors. The possible can. Challenging these definitions is an act of modal criticism and a prerequisite to the shaping of futures.

Throughout the history of philosophy, the entities belonging to these modal domains underwent significant changes: Aristotelian ontology differentiates between inalterable substances that inhere essential attributes and nonessential accidents; Descartes opposed the two substances res cogitans and res extensa; empiricism and sensualism foster experience and perception as epistemologically primary to substance; Kant positioned substance as the hypothetical persisting rest within the changes of perceptible qualities; phenomenology emphasized the givenness of the world for a consciousness and so on. These drifts predominantly follow one direction: from the eternal towards the alterable, from the impossible and necessary towards the possible.

For the therefore increasingly growing domain of the "unnecessary and possible" I propose the term accidence. The histories of philosophy, of sciences in general, and of technological "progress" show an expansion of accidence. Criticizing the respective definitions of the necessary and the impossible is one driver of this expansion. Actual attempts to shape and design the newly possible informs the observer about the hypothetically possible and the actually possible subdomains.

Critique and design, technological and social progress expand the accidence domain. I will discuss this dynamic as well as its effects and challenges. If almost everything can be potentially different - what follows from that: a wider future or no future at all?

---

20 March 2018, 13.15-15.00
Research studio
Marije de Haas
"The art of dying well - with dementia"

My research is about euthanasia in dementia, based on the dutch legal framework for euthanasia. Euthanasia in dementia is legally possible in the Netherlands, but in practise this rarely happens because the symptoms of dementia clash with the due care criteria for euthanasia: the patient must be able to consent at the time of death, and there must be unbearable and hopeless suffering.

I am trying to address these problems through speculative designs. I am creating three speculations that each tackle a specific problem area:

1) A person may have a rational and considered request for euthanasia in case of dementia, however, doctors can't or won't comply with this request if the patient in question can't confirm this request at time of death (even if this is because of the symptoms of dementia).
> Can we alleviate physician's responsibility in considering euthanasia requests?

2) Suffering is hard to assess; it is subjective and context based. Suffering is even harder to assess when one can't communicate effectively with the person whose suffering you are trying to measure.
> How can we measure suffering in dementia?

3) Ideas on what is a good death vary over time and cultures. In contemporary western culture death is a taboo and rarely discussed. When death is considered by those who are terminally ill, or professionally engaged in this subject, it is preferred to die "prepared", to finish what is important and to leave your loved-ones able to cope without you.
> How can one have a good death in dementia?

For this seminar I would like to hold a design crit. I will present the three speculations and I invite you to critically appraise the speculations crafted and give me feedback.
• Do the speculations I have crafted (successfully) address the problem areas identified?
• How can I best use these speculations to further the debate?

I would also like to reflect on:
• Using design in design research: how do we address the quality of the designs created?
• Using design in design research: how can we write about the designs created?
• Using design in design research: how can we invite readers to observe the designs created in their original intended form (i.e. how do we get them to click a link and watch a video?)

---

6 March 2018, 13.15-15.00
Research studio
Morteza Abdipour
"The Structure of Thesis"

In this seminar, I will present my thesis contents and discuss about the chapters with more details. Some failures and lessons that I have learnt so far by doing my Ph.Licentiate dissertation.

The structure of this thesis has influenced by constructive design and practice based research methodology. Particularly, I apply upon the use of the program approach and developing the whole thesis by tiding the lab prototyping and experiments together with theoretical elements. Such this structure provides possibility of emerging invisible work relationships between Digital Wallpaper (DW) and people.

---

22 Feb 2018, 13.15-15.00
Green room
Arianna Mazzeo
"Performative Citizenship. A design intervention with Umea. Toward a civic co-production"

Topic: Design interventions are signals of social making in the city all over the world. What if Umea is the open lab of opportunity for all?
Researching trough design and performative ethnography we explore how theory and practice are inseparable in the making of our
relations.
AUDIENCE: Design Students, Encounters, Faculty, Phds, Community, Citizens.
ROOM: With flexible space, projector, internet, open space for working in groups and move around the space, outside
METHODOLOGY: Co-design, Performative Design Ethnography
FACILITATOR: Arianna Mazzeo ( DesisLab Elisava Director and Director Masterlab Service Design Systems, Exploring place and community through design research)
MATERIALS: internet, projector, mobile ( your own).
LEARNING OUTCOMES: You will learn how co-design a performative design intervention with Umea citizens, working with a multidisciplinary team of Umea Faculty, phDs, Researchers and encounters.

Arianna Mazzeo
Arianna is Design Research and Social Digital Innovation Professor as well she is the Director of the Masterlab in Service Design Systems, and Head of International Relations at the Elisava Barcelona School of Design and Engineering, Barcelona, Spain. Involved in European Innovation Projects since 2000, she coordinates under the frame of the Open Design Program, the first European Open Design School based on the open culture values, collaboration and co-design with community and collaborative cities, to open new scenarios in design education trough design research. She holds a PhD in Design Ethnography and she is responsible for the design research group Cambio / Changes, helping professionals, private and public institutions, cultural and creative hubs, administrations, foundations, associations and creative industries as well as informal groups to research through design for a real impact. From September 2017, she lead with Ezio Manzini,  the Desis Network Cluster " Design for City- Making" to explore how cities can play a role in generating, or regenerating, urban commons. She has worked in Cameroon, Mexico, Turkey, Armenia, and South Africa on social digital innovation programs and local government policy agenda, in order to re-design and re-think design education through new open educational resources (OER) and new learning formats outside the classroom, in the city as the open lab of opportunities for all.

---

6 Feb. 2018, 13.15-15.00
Aditya Pawar
"Taxonomies of openness"

The proliferation of the term openness in design practice, often in combination with rhetoric of diversity, innovation and creativity has made it a buzzword. As the term continues to be part of a designer's vocabulary it's meaning increasingly becomes obscured. This presentation tries to enhance the conceptual clarity of the term and distinguishes 4 concepts of openness from: object-oriented, organisational, socio-economic and the socio-political. Each concept has a different understanding of openness based on its historicity and the choice of methodology that its practitioners espouse. This presentation also points to the values and stakes ascribed to each stance. In this presentation, I will argue for the need to develop a critical conversation based on a figure- ground relationship between collaboration and openness, which will help us to make sense of the objects, values, motives of collaborations in participatory design projects.
This presentation is an iteration of the chapter 'framing openness' from the draft of my 50% thesis and will be presented as a conversation prompted by examples from my thesis work.

---

30 Jan. 2018, 13.15-15.00
White room
Monica Lindh Karlsson
"Threshold for embracing togetherness"

We have investigated industrial design and ways to open up for involvement while doing design together in terms of aesthetics. Although aesthetics historically have been approached in various ways, we have found the role for a designer as responsible for a whole as ruling social order have not changed. Hence, we have highlighted the threshold of designers acknowledged to be responsible for a whole and keeping things together. Through project courses in design education with multi-disciplinary teams we have explored ways to break with pre-dominating social orders that position designers as responsible. From our initial investigations we argue that design doing can embrace democracy in terms of aesthetics, if we recognize those involved as accountable for a whole. Such re-thinking of social orders allows aesthetics to shift gravity from a programmatic order based on one position, toward a distribution of several voices to be heard and a collective exploration of a whole.

We have found that industrial design can be pushed toward a social order framed as shared accountability for a whole in terms of aesthetics. We have articulated that industrial design can be pushed toward an aesthetic order allowing a poetical and socio-political aesthetic to emerge, distributing recognition of several voices and positions toward a whole.

If we are to develop industrial design to meet contemporary challenges of e.g. democratization and diversity, we might need to consider designers' capacity to bring in diversity through poetical socio-political aesthetics. Hence, we need to question how social orders position designers as responsible for a whole, and subsequently the way we organize and conduct design education.

---

16 Jan. 2018, 13.15-15.00
Term kick-off
Collective

Seminars Fall 2017

---

12 Dec. 2017, 13.00-15.00
Marije de Haas
Søren Rosenbak
Special double bill: Design fiction bonanza!

---

5 Dec. 2017, 13.15-15.00
Aditya Pawar
"Design and open-collaboration in post-industrial society"

---

31 Oct. 2017, 13.15-15.00
Morteza Abdipour

---

24 Oct. 2017, 13.15-15.00
Nicholas Torretta

---

3 Oct. 2017, 13.15-15.00
Annika Bindler (University Library)
Writing workshop

---

12 Sept., 13.15-15.00
Marije De Haas
"Speculative design: An Advance Euthanasia Directive for Dementia"

In this seminar we explore the ethical complexities around euthanasia requests for dementia.

---

5 Sept. 2017, 13.15-15.00
Nicholas Torretta
"Humble design"

---

28 Aug 2017, 13.15-15.00
(collective)
Semester kick-off and planning

---

Seminars Spring 2017

16 May 2017, 13.15-15.00
"Embodiment of people and convey the influences of large display at domestic environment"
Morteza Abdipour

Imagine in coming years we go to a store and buy some rolls of digital wallpaper. After installing in an environment, the entire of surface becomes interactive display. This might be interesting, but how home environment will change when we use Large display at home? What large display can do in real world?

In this seminar, I attempt to present the general understanding of the key elements that are necessary to make the structure of this research and particularly the main ones to formulate the research question. There are many ways to study but the main challenge is how do I choose the choices? The model and examples that I will argue in this complex subject tries to give a tangibility of situation to understand the notion of large display and scale of application. This might help me to identify what do I need to fulfil the research program among of methodological choices.

Last month, I set up some studies in the Design Lab to explore people's behaviour in terms of experiencing ambient large display. I will present briefly the observations that express what did people do during different sessions? How they adapted their behaviour? What they require to experience appropriately in terms of using big screens as virtual environment in the lab?

---

9 May 2017, 13.15-15.00
"50% seminar onwards: 'Design for open collaborations"
Aditya Pawar

The seminar traces the feedback from Aditya's 50% seminar and the reflections between research programme and experiment.
The seminar will bring up questions on how the research is positioned within a community of practice, what methodological choices have been made and end with what might an exemplar of such a design proposal look like.

---

2 May 2017, 13.15-15.00
"Questioning the past to ask the future"
Nicholas Baroncelli Torretta

My PhD research concerns the interplay between learning, practicing and teaching in collaborative design for sustainability. I pay special attention to how we articulate and address the power relations and privilege of positions involved in such design practices.

---

18 April 2017, 13.15-15.00
Janaina Teles Barbosa

I would like to invite you for my seminar where I will talk about the main topics of my research project and the challenges that I am facing at the moment.

The title of my PhD research project is: Designing collaboration for commoning: micro-power dynamics in urban transitions. I am examining the roles of design agency in the experience of making together in urban design practices, asking: How can design practices create, support and sustain transition spaces that facilitate transition practices for commoning in urban communities? Thus, I am exploring this issue though a qualitative analyse of four case studies, two in Brazil and two in Portugal.

About me:
I´m a PhD student in Design at the Aveiro University in Portugal and I am currently a visiting PhD guest student at the UID where I intend to improve the methodology of my ongoing research through a knowledge exchange with other students at UID.

My background is in Anthropology and Visual Arts. In the past 10 years, I have been working in research projects related with the production of meanings related with the production of traditional handcrafts in rural communities in Brazil, including artistic community interventions for social inclusion. Moreover, I have also been developing personal artistic projects on the scope of urban performances, art installations and photography.

---

4 April 2017, 13.15-15.00
Writing workshop
(collective)

---

28 March 2017, 13.15-15.00
"Inquiries into limitations and possibilities to regulate design situations"
Daniela Rothkegel

My research combines a design perspective with a systemic approach on the role of information generation. The focus of my research is methodological. I am interested into the generation and handling of information in human-technology relationships with the help of intermediary objects. Intermediary objects are transitional states of products. Therefore I am investigating into the basis for designers to understand the content of ideas practically while making proposals.

---

7 March 2017, 13.15-15.00
"Aesthetics of Being together"
Stoffel Kuenen

A workshop on the trajectory of an argument from set-up to closure in a dissertation.

---

21 Feb. 2017, 13.15-15.00
"Drifting"
Monica Lindh Karlsson

At our research seminar next week we will do a workshop together.

The aim of the workshop-seminar is to collectively, and individually, explore our research landscapes in our project and studies in terms of experimentation and 'drifting'.

We will take the notion of 'drifting' as our point of departure and critically explore our own programmes e.g. how we see actions building up our arguments, how things related, or not relate, to our programmes.
Peter Gall Krogh presented his project of drifting at an earlier research seminar at UID.  However, since not all of us where there at time and others might want to re-fresh his idea of drifting, I attach the article that Peter Gall Krogh has written together with Thomas Markussen and Anne Louise Bang.

In the workshop seminar we will create our own tentative visualization of our programmes and use them for discussing and problematize ways of conducting Research Through Design from our own positions. (Think of the visualization that I presented at our last PhD Festival 2016). We will look into and discuss things that are concerns of issues for us and also collectively reflect over our materials.

Everyone are asked to bring issues, perspectives and challenging concerns to the workshop.

---

7 Feb. 2017, 13.15-15.00
"Mediating (infra)structures: Technology, media, environment"
Heather Wiltse

This will be a text seminar based on a forthcoming book chapter.

---

24 Jan. 2017, 13.15-15.00
"Pata-design Post-50%, Part II"
Søren Rosenbak

My research concerns the prototyping of a pataphysically infused critical design practice (what I've come to refer to as pata-design). In this seminar, I'll pick up some of the key discussion points from my 50% seminar in June 2016, in order to sketch out future research trajectories for the year ahead. In this way, I hope to have an informal discussion about ways to move forward. Hope to see you there!

 

---

An archive of previous years' seminars is found here